Debug Info Assignment Tracking¶
Assignment Tracking is an alternative technique for tracking variable location debug info through optimisations in LLVM. It provides accurate variable locations for assignments where a local variable (or a field of one) is the LHS. In rare and complicated circumstances indirect assignments might be optimized away without being tracked, but otherwise we make our best effort to track all variable locations.
The core idea is to track more information about source assignments in order
and preserve enough information to be able to defer decisions about whether to
use non-memory locations (register, constant) or memory locations until after
middle end optimisations have run. This is in opposition to using
#dbg_declare and #dbg_value, which is to make the decision for most
variables early on, which can result in suboptimal variable locations that may
be either incorrect or incomplete.
A secondary goal of assignment tracking is to cause minimal additional work for LLVM pass writers, and minimal disruption to LLVM in general.
Status and usage¶
Status: Experimental work in progress. Enabling is strongly advised against except for development and testing.
Enable in Clang: -Xclang -fexperimental-assignment-tracking
That causes Clang to get LLVM to run the pass declare-to-assign. The pass
converts conventional debug records to assignment tracking metadata and sets
the module flag debug-info-assignment-tracking to the value i1 true. To
check whether assignment tracking is enabled for a module call
isAssignmentTrackingEnabled(const Module &M) (from llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h).
Design and implementation¶
Assignment markers: #dbg_assign¶
#dbg_value, a conventional debug record, marks out a position in the
IR where a variable takes a particular value. Similarly, Assignment Tracking
marks out the position of assignments with a record called #dbg_assign.
In order to know where in IR it is appropriate to use a memory location for a variable, each assignment marker must in some way refer to the store, if any (or multiple!), that performs the assignment. That way, the position of the store and marker can be considered together when making that choice. Another important benefit of referring to the store is that we can then build a two-way mapping of stores<->markers that can be used to find markers that need to be updated when stores are modified.
An #dbg_assign marker that is not linked to any instruction signals that
the store that performed the assignment has been optimised out, and therefore
the memory location will not be valid for at least some part of the program.
Here’s the #dbg_assign signature. Value * type parameters are first wrapped
in ValueAsMetadata:
#dbg_assign(Value *Value,
DIExpression *ValueExpression,
DILocalVariable *Variable,
DIAssignID *ID,
Value *Address,
DIExpression *AddressExpression)
The first three parameters look and behave like an #dbg_value. ID is a
reference to a store (see next section). Address is the destination address
of the store and it is modified by AddressExpression. An empty/undef/poison
address means the address component has been killed (the memory address is no
longer a valid location). LLVM currently encodes variable fragment information
in DIExpressions, so as an implementation quirk the FragmentInfo for
Variable is contained within ValueExpression only.
Instruction link: DIAssignID¶
DIAssignID metadata is the mechanism that is currently used to encode the
store<->marker link. The metadata node has no operands and all instances are
distinct; equality is checked for by comparing addresses.
#dbg_assign records use a DIAssignID metadata node instance as an
operand. This way it refers to any store-like instruction that has the same
DIAssignID attachment. E.g. For this test.cpp,
int fun(int a) {
return a;
}
compiled without optimisations:
$ clang++ test.cpp -o test.ll -emit-llvm -S -g -O0 -Xclang -fexperimental-assignment-tracking
we get:
define dso_local noundef i32 @_Z3funi(i32 noundef %a) #0 !dbg !8 {
entry:
%a.addr = alloca i32, align 4, !DIAssignID !13
#dbg_assign(i1 undef, !14, !DIExpression(), !13, i32* %a.addr, !DIExpression(), !15)
store i32 %a, i32* %a.addr, align 4, !DIAssignID !16
#dbg_assign(i32 %a, !14, !DIExpression(), !16, i32* %a.addr, !DIExpression(), !15)
%0 = load i32, i32* %a.addr, align 4, !dbg !17
ret i32 %0, !dbg !18
}
...
!13 = distinct !DIAssignID()
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "a", ...)
...
!16 = distinct !DIAssignID()
The first #dbg_assign refers to the alloca through !DIAssignID !13,
and the second refers to the store through !DIAssignID !16.
Store-like instructions¶
In the absence of a linked #dbg_assign, a store to an address that is
known to be the backing storage for a variable is considered to represent an
assignment to that variable.
This gives us a safe fall-back in cases where #dbg_assign records have
been deleted, the DIAssignID attachment on the store has been dropped, or the
optimiser has made a once-indirect store (not tracked with Assignment Tracking)
direct.
Middle-end: Considerations for pass-writers¶
Non-debug instruction updates¶
Cloning an instruction: nothing new to do. Cloning automatically clones a
DIAssignID attachment. Multiple instructions may have the same DIAssignID
instruction. In this case, the assignment is considered to take place in
multiple positions in the program.
Moving a non-debug instruction: nothing new to do. Instructions linked to a
#dbg_assign have their initial IR position marked by the position of the
#dbg_assign.
Deleting a non-debug instruction: nothing new to do. Simple DSE does not
require any change; it’s safe to delete an instruction with a DIAssignID
attachment. A #dbg_assign that uses a DIAssignID that is not attached
to any instruction indicates that the memory location isn’t valid.
Merging stores: In many cases no change is required as DIAssignID
attachments are automatically merged if combineMetadata is called. One way or
another, the DIAssignID attachments must be merged such that new store
becomes linked to all the #dbg_assign records that the merged stores
were linked to. This can be achieved simply by calling a helper function
Instruction::mergeDIAssignID.
Inlining stores: As stores are inlined we generate #dbg_assign
records and DIAssignID attachments as if the stores represent source
assignments, just like the in frontend. This isn’t perfect, as stores may have
been moved, modified or deleted before inlining, but it does at least keep the
information about the variable correct within the non-inlined scope.
Splitting stores: SROA and passes that split stores treat #dbg_assign
records similarly to #dbg_declare records. Clone the
#dbg_assign records linked to the store, update the FragmentInfo in
the ValueExpression, and give the split stores (and cloned records) new
DIAssignID attachments each. In other words, treat the split stores as
separate assignments. For partial DSE (e.g. shortening a memset), we do the
same except that #dbg_assign for the dead fragment gets an Undef
Address.
Promoting allocas and store/loads: #dbg_assign records implicitly
describe joined values in memory locations at CFG joins, but this is not
necessarily the case after promoting (or partially promoting) the
variable. Passes that promote variables are responsible for inserting
#dbg_assign records after the resultant PHIs generated during
promotion. mem2reg already has to do this (with #dbg_value) for
#dbg_declares. Where a store has no linked record, the store is
assumed to represent an assignment for variables stored at the destination
address.
Debug record updates¶
Moving a debug record: avoid moving #dbg_assign records where
possible, as they represent a source-level assignment, whose position in the
program should not be affected by optimization passes.
Deleting a debug record: Nothing new to do. Just like for conventional
debug records, unless it is unreachable, it’s almost always incorrect to
delete a #dbg_assign record.
Lowering #dbg_assign to MIR¶
To begin with only SelectionDAG ISel will be supported. #dbg_assign
records are lowered to MIR DBG_INSTR_REF instructions. Before this happens
we need to decide where it is appropriate to use memory locations and where we
must use a non-memory location (or no location) for each variable. In order to
make those decisions we run a standard fixed-point dataflow analysis that makes
the choice at each instruction, iteratively joining the results for each block.
TODO list¶
As this is an experimental work in progress so there are some items we still need to tackle:
As mentioned in test llvm/test/DebugInfo/assignment-tracking/X86/diamond-3.ll, the analysis should treat escaping calls like untagged stores.
The system expects locals to be backed by a local alloca. This isn’t always the case - sometimes a pointer to storage is passed into a function (e.g. sret, byval). We need to be able to handle those cases. See llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/assignment-tracking/track-assignments.ll and clang/test/CodeGen/assignment-tracking/assignment-tracking.cpp for examples.
trackAssignmentsdoesn’t yet work for variables that have their#dbg_declarelocation modified by aDIExpression, e.g. when the address of the variable is itself stored in anallocawith the#dbg_declareusingDIExpression(DW_OP_deref). SeeindirectReturnin llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/assignment-tracking/track-assignments.ll and in clang/test/CodeGen/assignment-tracking/assignment-tracking.cpp for an example.In order to solve the first bullet-point we need to be able to specify that a memory location is available without using a
DIAssignID. This is because the storage address is not computed by an instruction (it’s an argument value) and therefore we have nowhere to put the metadata attachment. To solve this we probably need another marker record to denote “the variable’s stack home is X address” - similar to#dbg_declareexcept that it needs to compose with#dbg_assignrecords such that the stack home address is only selected as a location for the variable when the#dbg_assignrecords agree it should be.Given the above (a special “the stack home is X” record), and the fact that we can only track assignments with fixed offsets and sizes, I think we can probably get rid of the address and address-expression part, since it will always be computable with the info we have.
